29/01/2026
Building ConsultancyArtificial intelligence is transforming industries across the globe, and building surveying is no exception. In 2023, our Building Consultancy team identified four key areas where AI could potentially affect the sector: reporting, over-reliance, human interpretation and inaccuracy. Following the recent publication in the RICS Modus magazine in January 2026, we revisited these conclusions to determine whether they still hold true.
The consensus remains clear. While AI offers valuable capabilities as a tool for building surveyors, it cannot replace the professional judgment and expertise that qualified surveyors bring to every project.
Real-world application: AI in document review
Our team recently tested AI systems for reviewing leases, licences and reports prepared by sub-consultants. The results were instructive.
AI-generated lease summaries appeared relevant and concise at first glance. The systems effectively identified key clauses and obligations, presenting them in an organised format that could save considerable time during initial reviews.
However, closer examination revealed significant gaps. Important provisions within the original lease documentation had been overlooked or inadequately summarised by the AI system. These omissions required a qualified surveyor to conduct a thorough review and provide proper interpretation.
This practical experience reinforces an important principle. As AI becomes increasingly employable as a tool, human interpretation remains integral to the advice provided to clients. Technology can assist with initial processing, but professional expertise must validate and contextualise the findings.
The terminology challenge in AI-generated reports
One area where current AI systems show clear limitations involves the terminology used in technical documents. Our testing revealed that AI tends to employ rather basic language when generating summaries and reports.
A more immediate concern relates to the use of American terms within documents and their English alternatives. Language and colloquial terms have their place in professional reporting, but they must be employed appropriately. AI currently lacks the ability to differentiate when specific terminology should be used based on context, audience or regional preferences.
This becomes particularly significant when surveyors work across multiple regions within the United Kingdom or in pan-European and global settings. Professional communication requires careful attention to language and context. A surveyor working on projects in London, Edinburgh and Dublin must adapt their reporting style to suit different regulatory frameworks and client expectations.
The professional standards set by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors emphasise clear communication and appropriate use of technical terminology. AI systems must be carefully monitored to ensure they meet these standards.
Professional liability and human oversight
Professional indemnity liability represents a critical consideration when incorporating AI into building surveying practice. Regardless of how a report is generated, any inaccuracies remain the responsibility of the surveyor who authorises and signs the document.
This means that professional indemnity insurance liability rests firmly with the firm and the individual surveyor. AI may assist in drafting portions of a report, but it cannot assume accountability for the final deliverable.
This reality shows why human oversight cannot be eliminated from the surveying process. Every AI-generated summary, analysis or recommendation must be reviewed by a qualified professional who understands the technical requirements, regulatory context and potential implications of the advice being provided.
The future of AI in building surveying
While AI has become part of the building surveying landscape, its role remains that of a useful tool rather than a transformative replacement for professional expertise. The technology can reduce time spent on administrative tasks such as initial document review and data compilation.
However, the interpretation of findings, assessment of risk and provision of tailored advice require human judgment. Building surveyors bring years of training and practical experience to their work, understanding how theoretical knowledge applies to real-world situations.
We remain convinced that AI will never replace building surveyors. Clear guidance from RICS through its AI policy is critical as the industry embraces this new technology. Importantly, AI policy will require regular review as the technology continues to develop.
Expert building surveying services from Eddisons
Our Building Consultancy team combines traditional expertise with modern technology to deliver comprehensive surveying services. We understand how to leverage AI tools effectively while maintaining the professional judgment and human insight that complex property assessments require.
For expert guidance on building surveys, condition assessments or lease reviews, call our team on 01908 678 800 or complete the contact form below.